<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s your workflow?</title>
	<link>http://www.edhidden.com/blog/2006/06/06/whats-your-workflow/</link>
	<description>Ed Hidden is a graphic designer, photographer, code-monkey, blogger, cubicle dweller and motorcyclist (often referred to by his online moniker: MotoEd). While interested in photography for about half his life, he focused on it as a career 4 years ago. Primarily the goal is shooting stock photography, but has been known to shoot some wheeled sporting events, portraits and anything that tells a story.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Los Angeles Photographer</title>
		<link>http://www.edhidden.com/blog/2006/06/06/whats-your-workflow/#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator>Los Angeles Photographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 00:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.edhidden.com/blog/2006/06/06/whats-your-workflow/#comment-886</guid>
		<description>I've been contemplating the exact same thing.  Seems like most folks I talk to are using iView Media Pro.  I mostly shoot weddings and portraits or headshots.  I haven't done any stock photography.  Any suggestions between the two?  I don't like the idea that iView Media Pro doesn’t write metadata to Canon RAW camera formats.  I would image they would update this at some point right? Or is it a licensing thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been contemplating the exact same thing.  Seems like most folks I talk to are using iView Media Pro.  I mostly shoot weddings and portraits or headshots.  I haven&#8217;t done any stock photography.  Any suggestions between the two?  I don&#8217;t like the idea that iView Media Pro doesn’t write metadata to Canon RAW camera formats.  I would image they would update this at some point right? Or is it a licensing thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
